Somerville news blog city forum massachusetts journal newspaper MA

«« Previous: SCC 40th Anniversary Celebration 

 Next: ‘Roots and Rock’ Music Breaks Out of Jail at Old Somerville Police HQ »» 

Somerville Parks & Recreation Spaces, Part II: Access, Safety & Equity Considerations

by eila in Accessibility, Civil and Human Rights, Economy & Poverty, Environment and Open Space, Investigative Reports, Neighborhoods and Squares, Public Health & Safety, Schools and Youth, Sports - Posted on August 21, 2009 at 2:34 am

GD Star Rating
loading…

Our friend reports that her son (22 months) fell while walking on bricks at the Walnut Street Park, fractured his right femur, and is in a cast for four weeks.  She says that bricks at the park were loose and the city attempted to repair them cheaply- and that they were also slick from the rain.  This resident’s report reinforces what wheelchair pedestrians have been saying to all who will listen: brick ground surfaces are a maintenance nightmare, and bricks are not slip resistant when wet.

First, our sympathies go out to this family, who must endure four months of a major impediment to summertime and autumn recreational pleasures; and second, this alerts us to the possibility that our neighborhood open spaces may be in need of safety and access evaluations.  Here, we’ll look at two parks, with safety, accessibility and equity in our focus:  Walnut Street Park/Playground in Union Square, and the Otis Street Playground in East Somerville.

What’s Equity Got To Do With City Playgrounds?

In our last post, we mentioned that the pristine Morse-Kelley Park will be receiving $45,000 in Recovery Act Funding from HUD, and we wondered what those Federal funds will be spent on.  Was that truly a public priority?  The answer (from a wonderful City staffer) is this: “At Morse-Kelley, the surfacing is in excellent shape, as you point out.  However, we would like to investigate the potential to increase plantings and permeable surfaces, while keeping a large active recreational program.  Drainage and lighting and are both areas which could be improved at Morse-Kelley.”

I think I’m being fed the party line here.  Since the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding is specifically to allow local governments to undertake environmental, housing and economic opportunity-creating projects primarily for residents of low and moderate income, it’s not clear why these CDBG-R (R stands for “Recovery”)  funds are prioritizing a park that is relatively healthy, and not within a Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA). NRSAs  are specifically targeted for CDBG activities.  For example,  two NRSAs in Somerville are Union Square and East Somerville.

WALNUT STREET PARK, at the corner of Giles Park and Walnut Street, Ward 3 Union Square area

The City Parks Inventory (dated 12/8/08 and included in the 2008-2013 Open Spaces and Recreation Plan) assesses Walnut Street Park, (Ward 3, .22 acres) as “ADA Accessible;” in addition, it is listed as having: a Community Garden, Playground and Tot lot, a water play feature, tables, water fountain, and trees/plantings.

From a distance, the Park beckons.   It is very lovely with trees, shade, birds and a real family atmosphere.

ENTRANCES

But as the pedestrian public approaches, the Walnut Street/Giles Park crosswalk, sidewalk and curbcuts pose safety and accessibility obstacles for individuals of all ages with mobility and balance issues.

The crosswalk is not level and smooth.  The curb cut closest to the park has threshold of 2 inches, a cross-slope of 7%, and a running slope of 14.5%:

CC2WalnutPark2"thresh7%Cross by you.

State and federal architectural accessibility building code standards for curb cuts and accessible routes include the following:

  • The crosswalk must be level, smooth and slip resistant.
  • Transitions from curb cuts to walks, gutters, or streets need to be be flush or free of changes in level
    greater than ½ inch.
  • Cross-slopes should not exceed 2%.
  • The running slope (a.k.a. the rise) of the curb (or ramp) should not exceed 1:12, or, 8.33%.

WALNUT STREET PARK’S ON-THE-GROUND CONDITIONS

Brick pavers are never an appropriate pedestrian surface.  They can’t provide a consistent cross-slope of 2% or less:

That’s 3.4%,; once inside, we see a range of cross-slopes, some OK, and many not, like this one, below,  at 3.3%…

…and here we see the average- 2.5%.  In addition, as with the photo above, we here view the potential tripping hazards that brick surface materials pose:

Brick pavers are a maintenance nightmare.  No matter how well they are laid in their beds,

these surface materials will heave and pop up, causing excessive and unsafe slopes and sharp, pointy surfaces.

The ground surface materials under the composite play component are synthetic rubber composite, and known as unitary synthetic materials.

These are preferred ground surface materials for recreation areas; however, just like the conditions at Dickerman Park, these are ready to be replaced.

The same applies to the old loose fill bark mulch, which does not provide the necessary depth and resiliency required by safety standards:

Careful on those swings!:

The top entrance to this park is inaccessible due to the steps, and the entry to this play structure has a threshold that looks to be a tripping hazard for some:

The only remaining entrance, nearest the “Community”garden, does not have a curb cut entry:

This lovely open space is clearly not an “ADA-Accessible” Park, because there are not even any accessible routes as we approach the gates!  Every barrier shown above will exclude wheelchair-using recreation enthusiasts from enjoying this public facility in an equitable and integrated manner.  This Park is an appropriate investment for renovations and lighting considerations, to provide a safe and accessible environment for the many families and Day Care Centers who come here regularly.

OTIS PLAYGROUND, Otis Street at Dana Street, East Somerville, Ward One

Otis Playground is listed in the City Inventory as: .10 acres, not accessible, with a playground, a tot lot, baby swings, youth and tire swings, water play, table, water fountain, and trees and plantings.  No lighting, gazebo, garden.

Otis Street is sliced in half by the barricade of McGrath Highway.  From the Otis Street/Edgarly School, we would mount and walk the plank of that monolithic, inaccessible Otis Street Pedestrian Overpass in order to visit our neighbors on this side of McGrath.

That Otis/McGrath overpass is a wonder of inaccessibility- and here’s the final touch:  a slope descent of 17.9%, made worse by the sloppy tar patch job.  But see that area on the right inside the gate?  Unused potential garden space, perhaps?:

Ignore that smell of brake fluid, or something, from the auto repair shop adjacent to this entrance, and proceed around the sidewalk to Otis Playground.  The sidewalk cross-slopes average 4.2%.  As with Walnut Park, we see that the brick industry has influenced the approach to this park and it is easy to spot the pointy edges of this unsafe pedestrian material at the gate.  No slope measurements were taken here:

The ground surface materials at this urban park are asphalt and bark mulch.  These are not accessible and safe materials, although the bark mulch may have been considered safe by industry standards when it was first laid down.  Looking to the right side we see old swings:

Only one more picture was taken, because the kids were so interested in the digital level that I was swallowed up in laughter and play.   This play structure is wonderful to look at and these kids were having a blast with this and the water play.  However, 50% of the varied play components in this composite structure are not ground elements (an architectural accessibility standard)- only the colored beads and two other elements of this structure can feasibly be used by mobility-impaired kids when a level, smooth and safe ground surface route is provided.

This sweet playground seems quite appropriate for CDBG investments.  It is a much needed amenity in this area- Foss Park at Broadway is not a close, safe or pedestrian-friendly walk for residents living nearby, on Otis, Bonair, Dana, Edmand, Livesley, Wigglesworth, etc..    This playground has the potential to offer a protected and safe oasis, where children with diverse physical abilities can play together, and where families and elders can rest and listen to the children’s fun!  In addition, it might be worthwhile to investigate creative ways to utilize and build out that McGrath/Otis Pedestrian overpass so that it provides a greener and healthier neighborhood shield from the highway, and also a foundation for some sensory,  art and musical experiences.

GD Star Rating
loading…
  • Share/Bookmark
Back to Top ↑
6 Comments »

«« Previous: SCC 40th Anniversary Celebration 

 Next: ‘Roots and Rock’ Music Breaks Out of Jail at Old Somerville Police HQ »» 

6 Responses to “Somerville Parks & Recreation Spaces, Part II: Access, Safety & Equity Considerations”

  1. eila, are you saying that the city is misusing CDBG funds? Isn’t that illegal?

    It sounds like your friend might have a solid case on which to bring a lawsuit against the city for her son’s injury. I wonder if the city weighed the financial and legal liabilities for surface materials when they selected the brick pavers? This sounds like another short-sighted decision at the expense of public safety.

    Thanks for all the wonderful photos and common sense suggestions! I hope the city takes note of this.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  2. eila says:

    The City’s plan to spend $45,000 of Federal Community Development monies on planning activities for a park that is clearly not in dire need of repair sparks some questions. One that I am asking is: Why was the tip-top Morse-Kelly park expedited for CDBG-R funding over the more deteriorated parks, such as Walnut and Otis,which are in CDBG-targeted economically distressed areas?

    However, this City plan alone is not enough to derive conclusions regarding Somerville’s overall compliance with CDBG regulations. The City’s HUD annual Action Plans and Consolidated Plans are supposed to be based upon community needs assessments, and in coordination with public participation. Perhaps we residents have not sufficiently seized our civic privileges – and simultaneous responsibilities- by providing the City with written and public comments to its HUD drafts regarding genuine on-the-ground community conditions and needs.

    Relevant to CDBG-R spending, Federal restrictions include:
    prohibitions on expenditures related to construction of buildings for the general conduct of government,
    political activities,
    purchase of equipment, and
    operating and maintenance expenses.

    Other CDBG restrictions include:
    bans on assistance to recreational facilities that serve a predominantly higher income clientele, and
    general promotional activities for the grantee.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  3. Janine D. says:

    Eila:

    Thank you so much for this story! It is my son who fell and is spending an additional 4 weeks in this cast. I will state that there are other kids on our street who are afraid to go to the park on Walnut Street because they think what happened to our son will happen to them.

    The city needs to take some responsibility in making sure all parks are safe for kids. This particular park is used by children 7 years old and under. Also, the fact that the water sprinklers spray water all over a portion of the rides is ridiculous. It makes the steps and slides unsafe and kids can fall and get hurt.

    Thanks so much!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  4. eila says:

    Janine, you are totally welcome! Thanks right back atcha for supplying the inspiration.

    best wishes to you and your family!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  5. Lynn McWhood says:

    Hi Eila,

    Sorry for the delay in responding to this, but your comments on Morse-Kelley have been bothering me for some time. While you may believe that Morse-Kelley is “pristine”, the people who actually use the park do not share your view. A large contingent of young people from Save Our Somerville showed up at the September l7 city meeting that was held to seek input on the redesign of Dickerman and Morse-Kelley, and they care very strongly about this park. The last time the park was renovated, the budget available was small and improvements were limited. Basically, the southern basketball court was moved east in response to complaints from people in the abutting house, who were being driven nutty by the basketball standard next to a bedroom window. The tot lot in the northwest corner was removed, on the theory that people could use the then new play equipment in Dickerman instead. A bizarre gazebo with a perforated roof and awkward seating was installed in its place, possibly a gesture in response to requests for a place where adults could sit. In addition there were some cosmetic changes intended to reflect things of interest to the neighborhood, and a couple trees were added. The young people were very upset about the moving of the basketball court because it turned out that this wiped out a long-cherished stick ball game. One woman spoke about the problem of eliminating the tot lot: Dickerman may be close, but there is a steep slope between Dickerman and Morse-Kelley which is enough to dissuade some people pushing kids in carriages from going to Dickerman. The youths spoke out about the perforated roof of the gazebo, which offers no shelter in rain, and I don’t think anyone likes the gazebo. The young people very much want some facility for skate boarding and are angry that new dog runs have been created while skate boarding facilities haven’t been created.
    I am also uncomfortable with the negative attitude you take toward the city park planners. I have lived across from Dickerman for close to thirty years, I attended all the public meetings for the last renovations of Dickerman and Morse-Kelley, and I have spent time studying small parks in Cambridge and Somerville. In my opinion, the current city park planning team is the best we’ve had.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  6. eila says:

    Hi Lynn,

    I appreciate the information clarifying the issues at Morse-Kelley, thanks very much for that report!

    As for the City park planning team, I think they are very good also. Where did you read me having a negative attitude towards these staffers?

    The issues I raise are not in the hands of the staff that work so hard and do an excellent job; generally, for the least pay. The buck stops at the top, where decisions are consistently made to defer barrier removal activities for another day, despite the fact that we have millions of dollars annually, via the Community Development Block grant funding, to plan and implement necessary architectural accessibility retrofits, and invest in future social sustainability.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree