<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fund This Story : Somerville Parking Tickets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/08/15/announcements/fund-this-story-somerville-parking-tickets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/08/15/announcements/fund-this-story-somerville-parking-tickets/</link>
	<description>An independent, open forum for reports and opinions about life in our city.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:37:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Dahlbacka</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/08/15/announcements/fund-this-story-somerville-parking-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-12523</link>
		<dc:creator>David Dahlbacka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 22:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=2589#comment-12523</guid>
		<description>This kind of abuse is inevitable in a city like Somerville with far too much residential tax base and far too little commercial tax base, which has a higher tax rate per square foot and imposes a lower draw on city resources. Until Somerville has a source of revenue other than parking and traffic fines on residents and visitors, this sort of thing is going to continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of abuse is inevitable in a city like Somerville with far too much residential tax base and far too little commercial tax base, which has a higher tax rate per square foot and imposes a lower draw on city resources. Until Somerville has a source of revenue other than parking and traffic fines on residents and visitors, this sort of thing is going to continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison Stieber</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/08/15/announcements/fund-this-story-somerville-parking-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-12517</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Stieber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 15:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=2589#comment-12517</guid>
		<description>Re: Kathye&#039;s post: Yes, absolutely, there should be permits for people visiting physicians. Kathye, I hope you will appeal this ticket, as well as notify your ward alderman and at least one of the aldermen-at-large, such as Dennis Sullivan. I would also suggest you let your dr&#039;s office know what occurred, as it will happen to other patients as well, and probably has already.

The predatory ticketing practices by the City must be challenged robustly, both by individuals each time they are targeted and by SPARC. The revenues that are being generated on the backs of residents and visitors who are simply trying to patronize local businesses, conduct necessary tasks, and utilize on-street parking in front of their homes (often because they have no off-street option) are ill-gained and unconscionable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Kathye&#8217;s post: Yes, absolutely, there should be permits for people visiting physicians. Kathye, I hope you will appeal this ticket, as well as notify your ward alderman and at least one of the aldermen-at-large, such as Dennis Sullivan. I would also suggest you let your dr&#8217;s office know what occurred, as it will happen to other patients as well, and probably has already.</p>
<p>The predatory ticketing practices by the City must be challenged robustly, both by individuals each time they are targeted and by SPARC. The revenues that are being generated on the backs of residents and visitors who are simply trying to patronize local businesses, conduct necessary tasks, and utilize on-street parking in front of their homes (often because they have no off-street option) are ill-gained and unconscionable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathye</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/08/15/announcements/fund-this-story-somerville-parking-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-12509</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 13:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=2589#comment-12509</guid>
		<description>Last week I visited my doctor in Union Square. There were numerous delays, for which I don&#039;t blame the doctor; I always tell her I&#039;d just as soon wait a while and know that she gives her patients the attention they need. The visit started late and was interrupted twice after I was in a surgical gown. I was there for more than two hours and had a parking ticket by the time it was over.

If this were all being supervised by a reasonable human I&#039;d tell my story and they&#039;d cut me some slack.

Shouldn&#039;t there by special permits for medical facilities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week I visited my doctor in Union Square. There were numerous delays, for which I don&#8217;t blame the doctor; I always tell her I&#8217;d just as soon wait a while and know that she gives her patients the attention they need. The visit started late and was interrupted twice after I was in a surgical gown. I was there for more than two hours and had a parking ticket by the time it was over.</p>
<p>If this were all being supervised by a reasonable human I&#8217;d tell my story and they&#8217;d cut me some slack.</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t there by special permits for medical facilities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somerville Parking Party</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/08/15/announcements/fund-this-story-somerville-parking-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-11935</link>
		<dc:creator>Somerville Parking Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=2589#comment-11935</guid>
		<description>This party is going to work with our public officials to ensure that they are focusing on using parking tickets to ensure there are more parking space (parking lots, etc) instead of them using it as a revenue source: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=106829646018767&amp;ref=mf  Please join and let your voices be heard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This party is going to work with our public officials to ensure that they are focusing on using parking tickets to ensure there are more parking space (parking lots, etc) instead of them using it as a revenue source: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=106829646018767&#038;ref=mf" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=106829646018767&#038;ref=mf</a>  Please join and let your voices be heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T M</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/08/15/announcements/fund-this-story-somerville-parking-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-10038</link>
		<dc:creator>T M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=2589#comment-10038</guid>
		<description>Reading through the letters here, it&#039;s clear that it&#039;s time for someone to bring forward either a statewide ballot initiative or introduce legislation declaring that all profits that are made from both parking tickets and red-light cameras must be donated to charity (I would narrow it down to homeless shelters, food pantries, and substance abuse programs just to keep things specific and not personally useful to most of the people involved in giving tickets).  Parking tickets should cover the costs the city has in running the Traffic and Parking division and nothing more.  (And no free lunches or extravagant parties for them either!)

When used judiciously parking tickets and red light cameras can do some good.   However, the temptation to profit from these is causing illegal and harassing parking tickets, and in the case of red-light cameras, increasing the number of overall accidents at intersections where they are installed.  Furthermore, red-light camera profits tempt cities to lower the yellow-light time in order to increase revenue which increases accidents (apparently lengthening the yellow light time can decrease the number of accidents at an intersection, while lowering it increases the number of accidents).  Clearly these are tools that need to be used judiciously and for the safety and good of the people, not to line the pockets of the cities/state at the expense of citizens&#039; safety and well-being.

I don&#039;t begrudge the police department revenue made by actually policing intersections and stopping drivers who run lights, but this would also be a warning to them to make sure they keep their tickets honest.

I&#039;m not in MA anymore, so I can&#039;t push this forward, but I will mail AAA and my insurance company asking for them to push forward such initiatives and contact my representative in my new district for the red-light legislation.  If any of you have gotten ballot initiatives started, please consider starting this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading through the letters here, it&#8217;s clear that it&#8217;s time for someone to bring forward either a statewide ballot initiative or introduce legislation declaring that all profits that are made from both parking tickets and red-light cameras must be donated to charity (I would narrow it down to homeless shelters, food pantries, and substance abuse programs just to keep things specific and not personally useful to most of the people involved in giving tickets).  Parking tickets should cover the costs the city has in running the Traffic and Parking division and nothing more.  (And no free lunches or extravagant parties for them either!)</p>
<p>When used judiciously parking tickets and red light cameras can do some good.   However, the temptation to profit from these is causing illegal and harassing parking tickets, and in the case of red-light cameras, increasing the number of overall accidents at intersections where they are installed.  Furthermore, red-light camera profits tempt cities to lower the yellow-light time in order to increase revenue which increases accidents (apparently lengthening the yellow light time can decrease the number of accidents at an intersection, while lowering it increases the number of accidents).  Clearly these are tools that need to be used judiciously and for the safety and good of the people, not to line the pockets of the cities/state at the expense of citizens&#8217; safety and well-being.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t begrudge the police department revenue made by actually policing intersections and stopping drivers who run lights, but this would also be a warning to them to make sure they keep their tickets honest.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not in MA anymore, so I can&#8217;t push this forward, but I will mail AAA and my insurance company asking for them to push forward such initiatives and contact my representative in my new district for the red-light legislation.  If any of you have gotten ballot initiatives started, please consider starting this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison Stieber</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/08/15/announcements/fund-this-story-somerville-parking-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-10030</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Stieber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=2589#comment-10030</guid>
		<description>You make some good points I&#039;d not thought about previously re: possible abuses of traffic-law enforcement through revenue generation. I&#039;ve favored the cameras-at-high-risk-intersections idea, but the examples you cite are certainly concerning. However, re: the $25 cost for disputing traffic tickets, I think this administrative fee is far outweighed by the increased insurance premiums if you do not dispute and are deemed guilty by default, as these stay on one&#039;s driving record for SIX years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some good points I&#8217;d not thought about previously re: possible abuses of traffic-law enforcement through revenue generation. I&#8217;ve favored the cameras-at-high-risk-intersections idea, but the examples you cite are certainly concerning. However, re: the $25 cost for disputing traffic tickets, I think this administrative fee is far outweighed by the increased insurance premiums if you do not dispute and are deemed guilty by default, as these stay on one&#8217;s driving record for SIX years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arbitor</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/08/15/announcements/fund-this-story-somerville-parking-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-10029</link>
		<dc:creator>arbitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=2589#comment-10029</guid>
		<description>The parking office can print you a history sheet for all your tickets and their status.

I would definitely suggest keeping records of all tickets and proof of resolution *forever*.  When it comes down to your word against the city later, maybe years later, you are guilty unless you have proof.

Unfortunately Massachusetts has given cities an effortless license to steal by allowing unreasonable fines backed up by the iron fist.  The temptation for the city is too great.  Unless the members of the traffic board and traffic commission are changed, what you see now is what you will get.

Regarding other traffic enforcement, it isn&#039;t a good idea for the city to get &quot;needed revenues&quot; that way either.  It is definitely good to enforce traffic laws, but once that is seen as a revenue source it opens up a fertile area for abuse.  Just check the internet to learn how red-light cameras are being used to fleece motorists by cities that shorten the yellow cycle.  One popular red-light camera tactic is to ticket people who don&#039;t come to a 100% stop when turning right on red -- even though that particular violation is responsible for very, very few accidents.  This is turning into a real revenue mill, with huge profits going to the private red-light camera companies.

And -- in case you didn&#039;t see it in the papers -- Massachusetts now charges you $25 to dispute a traffic ticket -- even if you are found innocent! 

It never ends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The parking office can print you a history sheet for all your tickets and their status.</p>
<p>I would definitely suggest keeping records of all tickets and proof of resolution *forever*.  When it comes down to your word against the city later, maybe years later, you are guilty unless you have proof.</p>
<p>Unfortunately Massachusetts has given cities an effortless license to steal by allowing unreasonable fines backed up by the iron fist.  The temptation for the city is too great.  Unless the members of the traffic board and traffic commission are changed, what you see now is what you will get.</p>
<p>Regarding other traffic enforcement, it isn&#8217;t a good idea for the city to get &#8220;needed revenues&#8221; that way either.  It is definitely good to enforce traffic laws, but once that is seen as a revenue source it opens up a fertile area for abuse.  Just check the internet to learn how red-light cameras are being used to fleece motorists by cities that shorten the yellow cycle.  One popular red-light camera tactic is to ticket people who don&#8217;t come to a 100% stop when turning right on red &#8212; even though that particular violation is responsible for very, very few accidents.  This is turning into a real revenue mill, with huge profits going to the private red-light camera companies.</p>
<p>And &#8212; in case you didn&#8217;t see it in the papers &#8212; Massachusetts now charges you $25 to dispute a traffic ticket &#8212; even if you are found innocent! </p>
<p>It never ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison Stieber</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/08/15/announcements/fund-this-story-somerville-parking-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-10028</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Stieber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=2589#comment-10028</guid>
		<description>You hit it right on the nail: ticketing IS actually Somerville&#039;s &quot;business,&quot; its major industry. The City is too lazy and unimaginative to generate needed revenues in a way that would reap any real benefit to residents and visitors--e.g., by enforcing the routinely violated traffic laws that were put in place to protect the public. Ever see any police presence in that red-light-running mecca, Union Square, or at the intersection of Beacon/Kirkland/Washington, other than after a collision has occurred and it&#039;s too late to do any good? Other towns, such as Cambridge, actually flag down dangerous drivers and hit them with massive fines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit it right on the nail: ticketing IS actually Somerville&#8217;s &#8220;business,&#8221; its major industry. The City is too lazy and unimaginative to generate needed revenues in a way that would reap any real benefit to residents and visitors&#8211;e.g., by enforcing the routinely violated traffic laws that were put in place to protect the public. Ever see any police presence in that red-light-running mecca, Union Square, or at the intersection of Beacon/Kirkland/Washington, other than after a collision has occurred and it&#8217;s too late to do any good? Other towns, such as Cambridge, actually flag down dangerous drivers and hit them with massive fines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T M</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/08/15/announcements/fund-this-story-somerville-parking-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-10026</link>
		<dc:creator>T M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=2589#comment-10026</guid>
		<description>What can be done?    The fact is that Somerville routinely issues tickets to cars that have valid permits on them and then all-too-often fails to dismiss the tickets even though they promise to when you call.  I no longer live in Somerville, but now have to pay an outstanding ticket for a friend&#039;s car where I had the extended visitor&#039;s pass in plain view, but the car was ticketed anyways.  This is ridiculous.

Not to mention that the idea that your friends can only visit 2 times out of a week or get ticketed (happened to a different friend, same week).  What business is it of Somerville&#039;s how often your friends visit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can be done?    The fact is that Somerville routinely issues tickets to cars that have valid permits on them and then all-too-often fails to dismiss the tickets even though they promise to when you call.  I no longer live in Somerville, but now have to pay an outstanding ticket for a friend&#8217;s car where I had the extended visitor&#8217;s pass in plain view, but the car was ticketed anyways.  This is ridiculous.</p>
<p>Not to mention that the idea that your friends can only visit 2 times out of a week or get ticketed (happened to a different friend, same week).  What business is it of Somerville&#8217;s how often your friends visit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arbitor</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/08/15/announcements/fund-this-story-somerville-parking-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-9973</link>
		<dc:creator>arbitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=2589#comment-9973</guid>
		<description>On the back side of Somerville parking tickets is a nasty, extortionist threat:

&quot;Failure to obey this notice within 21 days may result in additional penalties.  Failure to obey this notice may also result in the non-renewal of the license and registration of the registered owner.  Failure to pay parking citations may subject motor vehicle to seizure.&quot;

This is so heavy-handed as to be obscene.  That a parking officer can casually punch out a ticket that can result in the loss of a citizen&#039;s driver&#039;s license and vehicle is absolutely off the scale of fairness and reason.  That a trivial parking violation is put on the same scale as loss of driver&#039;s license is absurd.  This is government misuse of power.  

When I was about 20, in Berkeley, California, I saw a sticker stuck to a payphone: &quot;Make no mistake.  Government takes your money in return for controlling your life.&quot;  At the time it didn&#039;t make much sense to me.  I was naive.  I thought government was mostly well-meaning.  Over time it has become very clear, through example after example, that government at all levels is an arrogant master, not a servant.  How does this happen?  Sadly, when given authority, many people believe they are superior, and develop contempt for the masses.  Then bad things happen to the citizens.  

Here is a enlightening story from California about a city government, and court system, and their attitude toward citizens.

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/city-tickets-camera-2544539-santa-law

In Somerville, the parking ticket racket is similar.  Those in charge have rationalized the high fines backed by extortionist threats, and feel no guilt.  They simply don&#039;t care about with your objections, or mine.  They don&#039;t care about soiling Somerville&#039;s reputation with unfairly high fines.  They don&#039;t care about the consequences to a citizen when a ticket, for whatever reason, never comes to his attention, and who later loses his car or right to drive.  To &quot;Those In Charge&quot; such things are not of concern.  They simply don&#039;t care.  They like everything just the way it is.  The only thing they would like better is to raise the fines higher and take in even more money.  Unfortunately, they can&#039;t do this because most tickets have already hit the state maximum!

Today I read in the Somerville News that the city wants SomervilleVoices.org&#039;s Barry Rifkind to pay $200,000 up front before he can review parking and enforcement public records!  Well, it appears the Somerville machine is your master, not your servant. I find the government of Somerville to be disgraceful.  Frankly, I&#039;ve seen enough.  

I recently found a $50 parking ticket on my car, because I forgot to post my vistor&#039;s permit.  Previously I got another $50 ticket, with my permit was in FULL VIEW.  Yet another $50 ticket was issued -- but never placed on my vehicle -- I might have not known about it for years (until suspension of my license or registration).  I was luckt to notice it on the Somerville parking website while checking a different ticket.  This is a hopeless mix of mismanagement and extortion.  It has little to do with parking.  It has a lot to do with money.

I previously pledged $15 to the parking story.  With all respect to the members of SomervilleVoices, I have decided to withdraw my pledge and donate it somewhere else where it might have some effect.  Sorry.  I am not a resident.  This is your issue and your city, not mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the back side of Somerville parking tickets is a nasty, extortionist threat:</p>
<p>&#8220;Failure to obey this notice within 21 days may result in additional penalties.  Failure to obey this notice may also result in the non-renewal of the license and registration of the registered owner.  Failure to pay parking citations may subject motor vehicle to seizure.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is so heavy-handed as to be obscene.  That a parking officer can casually punch out a ticket that can result in the loss of a citizen&#8217;s driver&#8217;s license and vehicle is absolutely off the scale of fairness and reason.  That a trivial parking violation is put on the same scale as loss of driver&#8217;s license is absurd.  This is government misuse of power.  </p>
<p>When I was about 20, in Berkeley, California, I saw a sticker stuck to a payphone: &#8220;Make no mistake.  Government takes your money in return for controlling your life.&#8221;  At the time it didn&#8217;t make much sense to me.  I was naive.  I thought government was mostly well-meaning.  Over time it has become very clear, through example after example, that government at all levels is an arrogant master, not a servant.  How does this happen?  Sadly, when given authority, many people believe they are superior, and develop contempt for the masses.  Then bad things happen to the citizens.  </p>
<p>Here is a enlightening story from California about a city government, and court system, and their attitude toward citizens.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ocregister.com/articles/city-tickets-camera-2544539-santa-law" rel="nofollow">http://www.ocregister.com/articles/city-tickets-camera-2544539-santa-law</a></p>
<p>In Somerville, the parking ticket racket is similar.  Those in charge have rationalized the high fines backed by extortionist threats, and feel no guilt.  They simply don&#8217;t care about with your objections, or mine.  They don&#8217;t care about soiling Somerville&#8217;s reputation with unfairly high fines.  They don&#8217;t care about the consequences to a citizen when a ticket, for whatever reason, never comes to his attention, and who later loses his car or right to drive.  To &#8220;Those In Charge&#8221; such things are not of concern.  They simply don&#8217;t care.  They like everything just the way it is.  The only thing they would like better is to raise the fines higher and take in even more money.  Unfortunately, they can&#8217;t do this because most tickets have already hit the state maximum!</p>
<p>Today I read in the Somerville News that the city wants SomervilleVoices.org&#8217;s Barry Rifkind to pay $200,000 up front before he can review parking and enforcement public records!  Well, it appears the Somerville machine is your master, not your servant. I find the government of Somerville to be disgraceful.  Frankly, I&#8217;ve seen enough.  </p>
<p>I recently found a $50 parking ticket on my car, because I forgot to post my vistor&#8217;s permit.  Previously I got another $50 ticket, with my permit was in FULL VIEW.  Yet another $50 ticket was issued &#8212; but never placed on my vehicle &#8212; I might have not known about it for years (until suspension of my license or registration).  I was luckt to notice it on the Somerville parking website while checking a different ticket.  This is a hopeless mix of mismanagement and extortion.  It has little to do with parking.  It has a lot to do with money.</p>
<p>I previously pledged $15 to the parking story.  With all respect to the members of SomervilleVoices, I have decided to withdraw my pledge and donate it somewhere else where it might have some effect.  Sorry.  I am not a resident.  This is your issue and your city, not mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

