<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Budget update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/06/09/government-reform/senate-budget-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/06/09/government-reform/senate-budget-update/</link>
	<description>An independent, open forum for reports and opinions about life in our city.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:37:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Beckmann</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/06/09/government-reform/senate-budget-update/comment-page-1/#comment-8615</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Beckmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=1838#comment-8615</guid>
		<description>Putting a repair lot nearly at the end of a spur line vs. expanding an already larger and much used lot about half a mile away is not a very hard decision, for anybody but the MBTA! Look beyond the McGrath nose, and you&#039;ll see several hundred acres of repair yards just North of North Station!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting a repair lot nearly at the end of a spur line vs. expanding an already larger and much used lot about half a mile away is not a very hard decision, for anybody but the MBTA! Look beyond the McGrath nose, and you&#8217;ll see several hundred acres of repair yards just North of North Station!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tricky</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/06/09/government-reform/senate-budget-update/comment-page-1/#comment-8609</link>
		<dc:creator>Tricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=1838#comment-8609</guid>
		<description>Scratch that - I think you&#039;d add on to the south side of Big Blue.  Or just to the east of the bend in Inner Belt Road, where I&#039;m guessing the soccer stadium was supposed to go.

The point is for everyone involved except the T, there are better places than Yard 8 for a Maintenance facility. (Put it in the tow lot, hee hee).  Asking the T to make a minor concession doesn&#039;t seem like too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scratch that &#8211; I think you&#8217;d add on to the south side of Big Blue.  Or just to the east of the bend in Inner Belt Road, where I&#8217;m guessing the soccer stadium was supposed to go.</p>
<p>The point is for everyone involved except the T, there are better places than Yard 8 for a Maintenance facility. (Put it in the tow lot, hee hee).  Asking the T to make a minor concession doesn&#8217;t seem like too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tricky</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/06/09/government-reform/senate-budget-update/comment-page-1/#comment-8608</link>
		<dc:creator>Tricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=1838#comment-8608</guid>
		<description>Janine - It&#039;s not entirely a NIMBY mentality regarding the maintenance facility; my understanding the T has been fairly insistent upon the Yard 8 site primarily because they don&#039;t want to be troubled with backing their trains in (or out) of their facility.  If the MBTA could concede on that issue, you could more or less tack the new Green Line facility on to the north end of the existing Commuter Rail garage (that big blue thing).

Really, look at Google Earth, or a map - if you add on to the north side of Big Blue, you&#039;ve got the possibility to tie Brickbottom into new development in the Inner Belt area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janine &#8211; It&#8217;s not entirely a NIMBY mentality regarding the maintenance facility; my understanding the T has been fairly insistent upon the Yard 8 site primarily because they don&#8217;t want to be troubled with backing their trains in (or out) of their facility.  If the MBTA could concede on that issue, you could more or less tack the new Green Line facility on to the north end of the existing Commuter Rail garage (that big blue thing).</p>
<p>Really, look at Google Earth, or a map &#8211; if you add on to the north side of Big Blue, you&#8217;ve got the possibility to tie Brickbottom into new development in the Inner Belt area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine D.</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/06/09/government-reform/senate-budget-update/comment-page-1/#comment-8605</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=1838#comment-8605</guid>
		<description>Joe, where are all these other better places for the yard?  I am sure people near these areas would complain too.  All I see from McGrath when I drive it on a daily basis to and from work is empty school buses parked and the Cataldo ambulances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, where are all these other better places for the yard?  I am sure people near these areas would complain too.  All I see from McGrath when I drive it on a daily basis to and from work is empty school buses parked and the Cataldo ambulances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Beckmann</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/06/09/government-reform/senate-budget-update/comment-page-1/#comment-8604</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Beckmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=1838#comment-8604</guid>
		<description>Janine, Nobody argues that there is no need for a maintenance yard, and it&#039;s not a simple matter of Not-in-My-Backyard. It&#039;s that there are several locations that would be better - both economically and in terms of transit.

For that matter, when Cambridge got their UDAG money and built the Galleria and MultiCultural Arts Center, they (and the MBTA) also committed to move the Lechmere Station to the other side of McGrath. Why nobody digs out that commitment (through a Freedom of Information Act inquiry) and gets it enforced is simply the Mayor&#039;s fault. It&#039;s worth about $40 million, give or take a few quid, but, what&#039;s their money to him when he can get ours!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janine, Nobody argues that there is no need for a maintenance yard, and it&#8217;s not a simple matter of Not-in-My-Backyard. It&#8217;s that there are several locations that would be better &#8211; both economically and in terms of transit.</p>
<p>For that matter, when Cambridge got their UDAG money and built the Galleria and MultiCultural Arts Center, they (and the MBTA) also committed to move the Lechmere Station to the other side of McGrath. Why nobody digs out that commitment (through a Freedom of Information Act inquiry) and gets it enforced is simply the Mayor&#8217;s fault. It&#8217;s worth about $40 million, give or take a few quid, but, what&#8217;s their money to him when he can get ours!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine D.</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/06/09/government-reform/senate-budget-update/comment-page-1/#comment-8602</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=1838#comment-8602</guid>
		<description>Greg, every article I have read recently states thre is still opposition.  It may not be organized but it is still there. At the latest meeting, which i believe was last month, there was loud opposition regarding the maintenance yard.  You know what?  The yard is needed.  And people want to have the mentality of &quot;not in my backyard&quot; regarding this.  In that area, I am sure that the bus storage area and Cataldo don&#039;t really care.

I was told from neighbors that the Green Line would be in at least Union Square by 2011.  I was told this in 2005 when we purchased our home.  I see no movement yet.  If they need someone to help dig some tracks, I am willing to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, every article I have read recently states thre is still opposition.  It may not be organized but it is still there. At the latest meeting, which i believe was last month, there was loud opposition regarding the maintenance yard.  You know what?  The yard is needed.  And people want to have the mentality of &#8220;not in my backyard&#8221; regarding this.  In that area, I am sure that the bus storage area and Cataldo don&#8217;t really care.</p>
<p>I was told from neighbors that the Green Line would be in at least Union Square by 2011.  I was told this in 2005 when we purchased our home.  I see no movement yet.  If they need someone to help dig some tracks, I am willing to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/06/09/government-reform/senate-budget-update/comment-page-1/#comment-8599</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=1838#comment-8599</guid>
		<description>I do think the Green Line will happen. I believe it will happen, because everyone that needs to be committed to it happening is sufficiently committed. The EOT and the MBTA are are doing the things they need to do (planning, environmental reviews, public input sessions, etc) to make it reality. It could jeopardized somewhat if a new governor were to win in 2010, especially if the winner is Republican, but I think it would survive even that.

There has been justifiable opposition to the location of the maintenance facility in Yard 8, including by residents of Brickbottom, but they are nevertheless very much in support of the Green Line extension. I think Brickbottom would be upset at your suggesting that they are &quot;fighting it.&quot; I know of no organized opposition to the extension in Somerville --- it&#039;s one of the few issues in which the city seems to be in universal agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think the Green Line will happen. I believe it will happen, because everyone that needs to be committed to it happening is sufficiently committed. The EOT and the MBTA are are doing the things they need to do (planning, environmental reviews, public input sessions, etc) to make it reality. It could jeopardized somewhat if a new governor were to win in 2010, especially if the winner is Republican, but I think it would survive even that.</p>
<p>There has been justifiable opposition to the location of the maintenance facility in Yard 8, including by residents of Brickbottom, but they are nevertheless very much in support of the Green Line extension. I think Brickbottom would be upset at your suggesting that they are &#8220;fighting it.&#8221; I know of no organized opposition to the extension in Somerville &#8212; it&#8217;s one of the few issues in which the city seems to be in universal agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine D.</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/06/09/government-reform/senate-budget-update/comment-page-1/#comment-8597</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=1838#comment-8597</guid>
		<description>Why would the state assume the debt right now? This is not the time to be assuming any debt. The state is having enough problems paying for things.  I lived for years in NYC and not every train ran at night but at least they ran 24/7.  And the extensions that MBTA has done regarding the commuter rail? People are not using it.  What makes you think the Green Line extension is going to happen? I live in Union Square and there are still people pissed about it coming than want it. I wanted it to come because I could take it to work.  But Brickbottom is fighting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would the state assume the debt right now? This is not the time to be assuming any debt. The state is having enough problems paying for things.  I lived for years in NYC and not every train ran at night but at least they ran 24/7.  And the extensions that MBTA has done regarding the commuter rail? People are not using it.  What makes you think the Green Line extension is going to happen? I live in Union Square and there are still people pissed about it coming than want it. I wanted it to come because I could take it to work.  But Brickbottom is fighting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/06/09/government-reform/senate-budget-update/comment-page-1/#comment-8596</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=1838#comment-8596</guid>
		<description>Bankruptcy is not at all the only way the MBTA could be relieved of its debt. The state could assume responsibility for the debt for example. Carl Sciortino co-sponsored legislation to that effect.

Privatize the MBTA? Cause it&#039;s worked so well for health insurance, right? Janine, the MBTA is already semi-privatized. The commuter rail is operated by a private company, and the service is, if anything, worse than the subway. Privatization will only create a corporate monopoly that tries to gouge its ridership at every turn. 

NYC transit system is not in any way a model of financial health. It was recently bailed out to the tune of $2.26 billion by the state, and the fare is being increased from $2 to $2.25.

Why the T cannot run 24/7 is a good question. One of the features that makes that difficult is that maintenance is routinely performed on the tracks overnight when it is not running. The NYC MTA has the luxury of multiple tracks running between many locations, so when one track is being repaired, the trains only run on the other track. The MBTA experimented briefly with the Night Owl bus service that ran along different subway lines, but it was largely a flop. That said, if the T wasn&#039;t under such heavy financial strain right now, I would like to see the question of 24/7 service revisited. I think there are much bigger priorities, though, like extending the Green Line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bankruptcy is not at all the only way the MBTA could be relieved of its debt. The state could assume responsibility for the debt for example. Carl Sciortino co-sponsored legislation to that effect.</p>
<p>Privatize the MBTA? Cause it&#8217;s worked so well for health insurance, right? Janine, the MBTA is already semi-privatized. The commuter rail is operated by a private company, and the service is, if anything, worse than the subway. Privatization will only create a corporate monopoly that tries to gouge its ridership at every turn. </p>
<p>NYC transit system is not in any way a model of financial health. It was recently bailed out to the tune of $2.26 billion by the state, and the fare is being increased from $2 to $2.25.</p>
<p>Why the T cannot run 24/7 is a good question. One of the features that makes that difficult is that maintenance is routinely performed on the tracks overnight when it is not running. The NYC MTA has the luxury of multiple tracks running between many locations, so when one track is being repaired, the trains only run on the other track. The MBTA experimented briefly with the Night Owl bus service that ran along different subway lines, but it was largely a flop. That said, if the T wasn&#8217;t under such heavy financial strain right now, I would like to see the question of 24/7 service revisited. I think there are much bigger priorities, though, like extending the Green Line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine D.</title>
		<link>http://www.somervillevoices.org/2009/06/09/government-reform/senate-budget-update/comment-page-1/#comment-8595</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somervillevoices.org/?p=1838#comment-8595</guid>
		<description>The only way the debt will be relieved is through bankruptcy.  And the state is not going to allow it.  They keep rolling the debt over year after year.  

The handling, or lackthereof, of money comes from the management that obviously needs to be shaken up.  If I was governor, I would either semi-privatize or completely privatize the MBTA.  The subway in NYC runs 24/7 and the fee is reasonable.  Why can&#039;t the T run 24/7?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way the debt will be relieved is through bankruptcy.  And the state is not going to allow it.  They keep rolling the debt over year after year.  </p>
<p>The handling, or lackthereof, of money comes from the management that obviously needs to be shaken up.  If I was governor, I would either semi-privatize or completely privatize the MBTA.  The subway in NYC runs 24/7 and the fee is reasonable.  Why can&#8217;t the T run 24/7?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

