by fberman in Politics - Posted on June 1, 2009 at 3:04 am
loading…
We Need Your Help at Next Saturday’s (June 6) Mass. Democratic Party Issues Convention.
At this year’s Issues Convention (in Springfield), opponents of legalizing predatory slot machine gambling in Massachusetts will mount an effort to pass a Resolution “oppos[ing] the legalization of slot machines and any similar efforts to promote addictive and predatory gambling as a means of raising public revenues.” (The full Resolution is printed at the end of this posting.) We need your help. You don’t have to be a delegate to collect signatures.
[Why do we describe slots as "predatory gambling"? Read below and check out this youtube video: http://tinyurl.com/predatoryslots ]
How Can You Help?
We need your help in Springfield collecting Convention delegates’ signatures:
(a) to bring the Resolution up for a vote,
(b) to demonstrate broad-based support for that Resolution, and
(c) to build a network of supporters who can be marshaled later this Fall to oppose State legislation legalizing predatory slot machine gambling, and licensing slot machine warehouses at the Dog Tracks (which will otherwise shut down when the ban on greyhound racing takes effect).
Several carloads of Somerville delegates and supporters will head off to Springfield on Friday to attend — and collect signatures at — these pre-Convention parties:
- Fri. 6 to 9 PM LG Tim Murray Reception, McCaffreys Public House, 1171 Main Street
- Fri. 7 to 10 PM Black and Latino Caucus Reception, Montenia’s, 137 State Street
- Fri. 8 PM to 2 AM Kick-off Reception, MassMutual Center
- Fri. 9 PM to 12 AM Young Dems Reception, Shakago’s, 23 Hampden Street ($5 donation)
Others of us will drive to Springfield early Saturday morning to attend — and collect signatures at — two Saturday pre-Convention breakfast events:
- Sat. 8:30 AM AFL-CIO Breakfast with Secretary Galvin, Ballroom A
- Sat. 8:30 AM Welcome Breakfast with Congressman Capuano, Ballroom B
As delegates enter the Convention building, we hope to create a visible presence — and collect more signatures. Once delegates are seated (by Senate district), we hope to have enough people to collect signatures from each Senate district.
Contact Fred Berman (fredlori(at)@rcn.com or 617-501-1404) if you can help and want to share a ride and/or a hotel room in Springfield or for more info.
You don’t have to be a delegate to help! (You do have to pay $25 for a guest pass if you are not a delegate and wish to enter the Convention building, but we can help defray that cost if it is prohibitive for you.)
Finally, some of us will stay for an hour or so after the Convention to attend — and collect signatures at — the reception sponsored by the Progressive Dems of Mass, from 4 to 6 PM at Café Lebanon (1390 Main Street).
What’s Wrong With Legalizing the Slots?
Supporters of legalizing slot machines will talk about the potential for new State revenues from gambling, and will make claims about preserving jobs at the Dog Tracks… and they’ll be joined and generously funded by giants from the gambling industry who are waiting for the opportunity to prey upon Massachusetts residents.
In fact, the only real winners when Dog Tracks are turned into slot machine warehouses (Treasurer Tim Cahill’s description) will be the owners of those tracks and the gambling industry:
- Slot machine gambling will largely siphon off revenues from the Mass. Lottery, and away from neighborhood businesses — bars, restaurants, etc. — that depend on the discretionary spending of local residents.
- Legalizing and promoting slot machine gambling is as ethical a way to raise State revenues as promoting smoking — and lacing the cigarettes with nicotine to make them more addictive — in order to increase collection of taxes on cigarettes.
- Turning the Dog Tracks into slot machine warehouses will preserve few, if any, race track jobs
- The social problems attendant to unleashing the new generation of mesmerizing and addictive slot machines — which conveniently take credit cards, so you can lose money you don’t even have… — outweigh the potential additional revenues from gambling taxes.
Slot machine parlors won’t create the jobs that advocates of giant resort casinos have touted, and they won’t attract tourists from other States. They’ll simply suck money from neighborhood residents and businesses, and enrich the owners of the Dog Tracks that Mass. residents voted to close in last year’s election.
The Resolution
Whereas the Democratic Party has a long and proud tradition of advocating for social justice, working for policies that promote the public health, and fighting to protect citizens from exploitive and predatory business practices;
And whereas modern slot machines use neuroscience-informed technology to mesmerize and entrap gamblers and to keep them playing until they have exhausted their resources (“playing to extinction”);
And whereas medical research has documented the highly addictive nature of the brain’s chemical reactions to slot machine stimulation;
And whereas licensing and promoting such addictive, predatory gambling technology for the purpose of raising State revenues goes against the aforementioned values and principles for which the Democratic Party has long stood, and is at odds with the ideals that underlie our Party’s honorable and consistent struggle to end the deceptive and predatory lending, marketing, and pricing practices that have pushed so many families to the brink;
And whereas legalizing slot machines would erode participation in the Lottery and siphon away from local small businesses the discretionary spending on goods and services that they depend on;
And whereas the development of slot machine parlors would neither create significant new jobs, nor increase tourism in Massachusetts;
And whereas evidence from other states indicates that the long-term costs of gambling addiction — increased substance abuse, increased crime, increased family discord and dysfunction — outweigh the short term benefits of licenses and gambling revenues;
Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Massachusetts Democratic Party, as a matter of both principle and policy, opposes the legalization of slot machines and any similar efforts to promote addictive and predatory gambling as a means of raising public revenues.
(Submitted by delegates Bob Massie, Tom Larkin, and Fred Berman)
loading…
“The social problems attendant to unleashing the new generation of mesmerizing and addictive slot machines — which conveniently take credit cards, so you can lose money you don’t even have… — outweigh the potential additional revenues from gambling taxes.”
This statement is a complete misconception. Like this doesn’t happen with people buying scratch tickets from the Mass Lottery. Gambling is gambling – where you are buying a scratch ticker, Mega Millions ticket or playing a slot machine.
loading...
While I support this resolution, I am skeptical that the campaign will have any measurable effect on the outcome at the convention due to the fact that it will be decided by voice vote, which I critiqued here.
Janine, slot machines are way more addicting than the lottery. Gamblers at slots can lose much more money and faster than they would with the lottery. Our government should not be relying on gambling for revenues.
loading...
Barry, I disagree. I work in a courthouse thatvseels scratch tickets and Mega Millions tickets. I see the line of workers and court visitors with $20s in their hand hoping for a big payout with the scratch tickets (as well as other places). It seems it is people who look like they are on fixed incomes wasting what they have hoping to win. Have you ever seen all the MA plates at Mohegan and Foxwoods? All that money stays in CT and zero for MA.
loading...
Barry, while a voice vote is not the best vehicle for making a fair and reasoned decision, the Convention is an excellent place to reach out to people who care about the governance and future of Massachusetts.
As to Janine’s implication that there is no difference between the lottery and slot machines… yes there is; check out the video referenced above http://tinyurl.com/predatoryslots which describes how today’s slots are designed to suck gamblers in and keep them hooked.
Saying that there is no difference between the lottery and slots is like saying there is no difference between marijuana and heroin.
Complaining that money is leaving Mass to gamble in CT is like complaining that kids are going to liquor stores in the town next door where there is a lower drinking age, and responding by lowering the drinking age and running a campaign to “drink here” so that our merchants can reep the revenues.
But maybe you’re saying that all that matters is the bottom line … in which case why not open and promote prostitution parlors or heroin parlors? It would be an easy way to close the revenue gap, as long as you can put aside your moral compass.
loading...
Incidentally, I’m not saying that I’m against gambling or any of the other so-called vices. What I AM against is PROMOTING gambling and other predatory and exploitive business practices (and gambling and prostitution and drug dealing are businesses) for the purpose of raising revenues.
loading...
I have honestly never see a website that chastises those who do not have the same opinion as the people running this site. Is everyone aware that people are entitled to their own opinion?
Fred, there is no difference between marijuana and heroin because as far as I am concerned people are prosecuted for both. They are illegal drugs last time I checked my Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on my desk at work.
I am so done with this site. Good luck trying to get others to put their two cents in.
loading...